High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/21353/2016allowed

Suresh Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2016-08-08Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-21353 of 2016 .....

Date of decision:8.8.2016 Suresh Kumar .....Petitioner v.

State of Haryana .....Respondent ....

Present:

Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.48 dated 3.5.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 417, 418, 419 and 420 IPC read with Sections 63, 65 and 68 of of Copyright Act, 1957 read with Section 27-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 at Police Station Barara, District Ambala. Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondent-State and have gone through the record.

The present petitioner has already joined the investigation. He Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.09 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-21353 of 2016 [2] is not required for any custodial interrogation. It has been argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery of the alleged articles being manufactured in the brand name of other Company has been effected from the petitioner. No useful purpose will be served by sending the petitioner to custody.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find merit in this petition and the same is allowed. The interim order dated 17.6.2016 passed by this Court granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. August 8, 2016.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.09 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh