Rajbir v. State Of Haryana




    
       Date of decision: 7th August, 2015  Rajbir

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. P.K. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.

 !
"#  $ Allegations against the petitioner Rajbir in this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No.345 dated 28.09.2013 registered at Police Station Sadar Rohtak under Sections 302/34 IPC read with Section 25 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(I) and 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 are that he caught hold of the deceased Yogesh whereas his co=accused has given the blow. It is inter alia argued on behalf of the petitioner by Mr. P.K. Chugh, Advocate that the petitioner was found innocent during RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.07 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

investigations and that he has been subsequently summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. which is not controverted by learned State counsel.

Keeping in view ambit of the allegations and without feeling the necessity to go on to the merits of the case, the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. #  !
$   %&%'(" 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.07 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court