Gurpreet @ Rimpy And ANR v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-20552-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20552-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 17, 2015 Gurpreet alias Rimpy and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.P.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the fact that as per prosecution version, the injury attracting the mischief of Section 326, IPC, has been attributed to petitioner No.2-Sonu, therefore, he would not press the prayer for anticipatory bail on his behalf (petitioner No.2Sonu). Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the above prayer.

Dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioner No.2-Sonu son of Dharam Pal.

MEENU 2015.08.18 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-20552-2015 (O&M) -2Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Mewa Singh of Police Station, City, Samana, District Patiala, very fairly concedes that in compliance of the interim directions, dated 07.07.2015, petitioner No.1-Gurpreet alias Rimpy, who has been attributed simple injury by means of a datar, has joined the investigation and no more required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, interim directions issued vide order dated 07.07.2015 qua petitioner No.1-Gurpreet alias Rimpy are made absolute. Petitioner No.1-Gurpreet alias Rimpy shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2), Cr.P.C.

August 17, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.08.18 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh