Neelam & ANR v. Ranbir Singh & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH FAO No.3043 of 1996 Date of Decision.01.03.2016 Neelam and another .......Appellants Vs.

Ranbir Singh and others ........Respondents 2.

FAO No.3163 of 1996 Smt. Surjeet Kaur .......Appellant Vs.

Ranbir Singh and others ........Respondents 3.

FAO No.3164 of 1996 Smt. Gurwant Kaur and others .......Appellants Vs.

Ranbir Singh and others ........Respondents 4.

FAO No.409 of 1997 Smt. Ranjit Kaur .......Appellant Vs.

Ranbir Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

None.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no representation for the appellant(s) at the time when the matter is called. There was no representation even at the previous hearing.

2.

All the appeals are dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 01, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.03.04 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document