← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/21589/2018allowed

Happy v. State Of Punjab

2018-09-20Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

CRM-M No.21589 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.21589 of 2018 Decided on: 20.09.2018 Happy ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present :

Mr. L.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidakmeet Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral) The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.16 dated 31.01.2018, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') at Police Station City Dhuri, District Sangrur.

The operative part of the order dated 21.05.2018, vide which interim anticipatory bail has been granted to the petitioner, is reproduced as under:- "....Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegations in the FIR, petitioner gave an iron rod blow on the left leg of the complainant. It is further submitted that co-accused of the petitioner namely Heavenpreet Singh has already been granted the concession of anticipatory bail vide order dated 04.05.2018 passed in CRM-M-14972-2018. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is not attributed injury under Section 307 IPC.

Notice of motion for 20.09.2018...."

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in pursuance MOHD YAKUB 2018.09.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M No.21589 of 2018 to the order dated 21.05.2018, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation. Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Darshan Singh, has not disputed the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 21.05.2018 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 20.09.2018 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2018.09.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh