Ravinder @ Golu v. State Of Hayana

-1CRM-M-11758 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11758 of 2019 Date of Decision: 20.03.2019 Ravinder @ Golu

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Sandeep Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case arising from FIR No.186 dated 06.10.2018 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, 307, 120-B IPC at Police Station Behal, District Bhiwani. According to the prosecution, in the night of 05.10.2018, petitioner and his 9/10 accomplice armed with iron rods and sticks gave beatings to cousin of the complainant namely, Vikram. Vikram was also run over by the assailants with their jeep with an intention to kill him, as a result of which his hands and legs had broken. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that petitioner had not run over Vikram, while driving the offending jeep. Rather the same was driven by co-accused Shera, who has been granted regular bail by the trial Court.Petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2019. Conclusion of trial may take a sufficient long time. No useful purpose RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.26 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-11758 of 2019 would be served by detaining the petitioner any more in jail. Out of total 11, except the petitioner, remaining all 10 co-accused of the petitioner have been enlarged on bail i.e. one by this Court and nine by the trial Court. Treating the case of the petitioner at par with his aforesaid co-accused, he may also be granted concession of regular bail. On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposed the grant of regular bail to the petitioner.

Considering overall facts and circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Consequently, treating the case of the petitioner on the same parity as that of his aforesaid co-accused, he is ordered to be released on bail during pendency of trial, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. (RAMENDRA JAIN) March 20, 2019 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.26 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document