Manjit Kaur v. Amrik Singh

[106]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF P

PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA [1] FAO-322 23-1996 Decision : 28.04.2025 Date of D aur versus Manjit Ka Amrik Sin [2] Manjit Ka Amrik Sin [3] ...Appellant ngh ....Respondent FAO-322 24-1996 aur versus ...Appellant ngh ....Respondent FAO-322 25-1996 Singh versus Joginder S Amrik Sin Coram :

Present:

...Appellant ngh ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P PANKAJ JAIN Mr. T.S. Sullar, Advocate for **** J JAIN, J. (ORAL) the appellant(s).

PANKAJ [1] Learned counsel appearing on n behalf of the appellant(s) subm mits that the ap ppeals were preferred through M Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate, who has unfortuna ately expired.

[2] Despite repeated communica ations, appellant(s) have not co ome forward.

[3] Dismissed for non-prosecutio on.

[4] All pending miscellaneous s application(s), if any, sta ands disposed o off.

(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 28.04.202 'R. Sharma'

RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.28 21:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable :

Yes/No :

Yes/No