Mangal Singh v. State Of Punjab
" #$%$ & '
( )(
&* + ,$&*- (((( $ $ & .
/ .%0% ,
0&1
((((( %3 &" &
'
45 ( ,, 6
, 6
(
8.
+9
!"#$ %& '( ') *'*%* *+*,-( $ . / ,0+ .
*
/
/1 '( ') *'*% 11
2 / 3 1 / 1 41
2 5
671 11 .
8/1 /
/ 1
2 .
1 11 1 23 1 +'' 8/
/
!"#1
1 8 2
1 8 9 : ; /
1
1
/ 9 : ; '& '
*'*+
/ ; /1 /
)
9
/ < /
1 11 / / < /1
< /
+' $. "
1
1 /
/
< < = /
%
/ 1
2 1
+' $.+'' 1
11 /
> / )& $.
1 '* ', *'*%1 / /
+
/1
'( ') *'*% 1
1 11
/ /
'
/ '% *) / '* '0 *'*+ "
1
;
1 ') ', *'*% (
"1
;
/
/ /<?
;
! "
; / 1 1 /<?
; "
<?
;31
"
#
$
%&' ()"""""
(
*
+ $
(("""""
(#
, -((
&
. /# '
.
0)( 1
2
$
3
!
# !
4
5
! $
&
8 / 1 /
/
;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. National Investigation Agency, 2022(1) SCC
695 has held as under:
"Deprivation of personal liberty without ensuring speedy trial is not consistent with Article 21 of the Constitution of India. While deprivation of personal liberty for some period may not be avoidable, period of deprivation pending trial/appeal cannot be unduly long. At the same time, timely delivery of justice is part of human rights and denial of speedy justice is a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice." 9.
This Court would refrain itself from commenting anything on the merits of the case. Keeping in view the arguments raised by both the sides and perusing the record, the Court is of the opinion that learned counsel for the petitioner succeeds in making out a case for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Nothing said herein shall be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.
, 6
( )(
21 @ 5 A
A$ @
A$