Kiranjit Kaur And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS
!"
!
CRM-M- 14591-2022 KIRANJEET KAUR AND OTHERS # STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
$ % & CRM-M- 14623-2022
' ' ( # STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
$ ) *+) ', ' -
for the petitioners in CRM-M- 14591-2022.
for the respondents No.2 to 4 in CRM-M- 14623-2022.
for the petitioners in CRM-M- 14623-2022 and for the respondents No. 2 to 5 in CRM-M- 14591-2022.
, ' - % #.& ! "
## $ % &
' # ##
$
$
'
$ ( )*
%
$ %
-2- +
,-( % + % + # !./0 1 % % 2++34
5 % 5 % 78!- 9!!9(9(9
0(00(,0(: 0(; 0, % < # + !-;9 # 8 #7
) # =<8!:/ (-9.(9(9
0(0 0(, 0(: 0(; 0, 09- % < # + !-;9 1 % % 2<+34
# 8 #7
) # ' ## =<8!:/ (-9.(9(9
0(0 0(, 0(: 0(; 0, 09- % <+ ##
#$ % % $ (!90(9((1
> &04
'
$ 0 " $ ' $$ % # # + ?<##6
9/9,(9((% +
$
'
$ $ ' ## % ,
$
%
7 # @ #
) # 8 -,- !;9/(9((" #
> $ $
&
!"
# $ % "
& ' !
(
") *!
+ !
,& ,& !
(
-
'
&
%%# '&) !
% - .) *!
&) , *, & /!
&) -
'
& 0#1
-3-
!"
# $ % "
'
-
& -
!
' 11
& 0#
%%#1
-' - ( &
- & & ' & '
& && 1
"
# $ % "
2 0#
%%# 0# -
& 1 # $ % "
% 3&
& 2
& !
(
,& !
(
& 0# $ 1 44
5616 15656 & 7 45445 1 8 ( # $ & 1
!"
# $ % "
0# -
+ !
,&
%%# -
, * , & /!
&) *& !
19 : A
# $
%
% $
$ *
#
$
$
-4- ; A
#% $
#
=< ' ## #7* ##
#$ 6 / " = ##) % +
%
$
!
""
#
$ %
:;58<
&
'-
- '
'
- - -( & 2 & 85 ( 11(1< '
-
-
11 = -&
'( & = = & *& =1 ;5 & '
(
'
& '
) '* > :- , ' +1 ' & &
7 < & *& &'
-& ' & 19 ;46<
*& ' ' *& *& '1
-
& -'
' 2
& &
( & - 2 & ' & '
)
*& 1
-5- ;4 $ - - 456; ( 11(1 ' & &
& 85 ( 11(1 ;45<
'?& '
' - & 1 & *& & 85 ( 11(1 & &
&
' & &' = & *& =1%&
@
&
' - -' ( & -' 2 & 85 ( 11(1
-& ' &
1 <
- ' & & - 2 & ' - '
&
& *& ' & &
& 1 ;44 < ' -
& -
& & '- & ( 11(1
( & & 851 0&
-
( & ?&
@
&
-
- & 456 ( 11(1
-& & *& 1 ;4 < & 85 ( 11(1 - 2 A2@%- +& -&
( & 1 <
- 2 &
@ - > ( & ) 2 1 ' &
-6- &
1 < & 85 ( 11(1 1> > ( & 2 ' &
& 1 < 2 -
& 1 < ( & 2 @
' &
1<( & '
& ' @
'
'1# & &-' '
- & & ( & & & & & &
- &
' & '1 - " # # $ $# # '
% 6 %
' # $$ * B # $ +
%'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012)10 SCC303'. Still further, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another" (2017) 9 SCC 641'. 9.
<
'% # #
$
% # $ $ ' # *
% $ " % % $ #5 #* '
% # $$ !9 " B # $ + #
% C"# + , , -
& *
$
-7- )
.!/0
' D $ #
'
% >
# $ *
% %% %
6 % ' ' # $
#
+ =< '%
#
$ "
B # $ + >
&
19. We thus sum-up and hold that as opposed to Section 320 Cr.P.C. where the Court is squarely guided by the compromise between the parties in respect of offences 'compoundable' within the statutory framework, the extraordinary power enjoined upon a High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, can be invoked beyond the metes and bounds of Section 320 Cr.P.C. Nonetheless, we reiterate that such powers of wide amplitude ought to be exercised carefully in the context of quashing criminal proceedings, bearing in mind: (i) Nature and effect of the offence on the conscious of the society; (ii) Seriousness of the injury, if any; (iii) Voluntary nature of compromise between the accused and the victim; & (iv) Conduct of the accused persons, prior to and after the occurrence of the purported offence and/or other relevant considerations.
!! " %##' #
% % $
#% ' ##
#$
$$#
% $'
,-(++ & 4 " %
& "
%%#
'
$ % $
E
# % 5
#
-8-
" & #$
% *% $ 4 "
## #
=<'
* (9(9 ##
%# * 4 8! (1 CRM-M- 14591-2022) %%
$ #5 #*
$
$ % # #
' ## '5$# 4 801 CRM-M- 14591-2022) (!*
# #5 #*
#
$ %
$ $
4 8! ,1 CRM-M- 14623-2022) are in their twenties and
# #5 #*
# $ %
$ $
4 Petitioner No.2 is 53 years of age and petitioner No.3 is 46 years old 1 CRM-M14623-2022) and
% $ #5 #*
$
$ % # #
' ## '5$# vii) " %% 6
%% ' # 5
%
*$
# # < #
5
% +
-9viii) +
% $ % $
% #$ #5 #*
&
*# $
#
ix) " $ #5 #* %
# * % '
% $
$$ $
>4 8# $
#$ $ ' # *
$ F xi)
%% * #
# *
# $ *%
%
=< xii) " $#
#5 #*
$$ % $
+
$ #5 #* '
% # " %#' ' ## '
$ # %% $ % ##* & >
# * 12.
In view of the report of the
7 # @ #
) # a $ $# # '
* $ > + 1
-'
$
$
! ! ' ## "# + , , -
&
$
)
.!/ # * = ##) % +
-'
*
!
""
#
$ %
$
##' " % G.D.
No. 18 dated 01.10.2020 under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Rangar Nangal, District Batala in FIR No. 157 dated 28.09.2020 under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 34
-10and 308 of the IPC registered at Police Station Rangar Nangal District Batala as well as FIR No. 157 dated 28.09.2020 under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 34 and 308 of the IPC and all other consequential proceedings arising there from # /#01 23/ 6 $ ' % $ dated 21.03.2022 (Annexure P-3) However, the same would be subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the each petitioner in CRM-M- 14591-2022 with the "High Court Bar Association Environment Protection Fund" and Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the each petitioner in CRM-M-14623-2022 with the "Punjab and Haryana High Court Lawyers Welfare Fund", Chandigarh within one month from receipt of certified copy of this order.
##' %, ' -& + 4 !
. G $ 5 ? H ?8 G $ # H ?8