← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2092/2017allowed

Manjula Pillai v. State Of Punjab

2017-12-20Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-2092-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-2092 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 20, 2017 Manjula Pillai ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. D.A.G. Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.162 dated 13.11.2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Sadar Patiala, District Patiala.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Learned State counsel on instructions from Head Constable Vikramjeet Singh, submits that petitioner has joined the investigation, which is almost complete and police will file the final report in the Court in due course. Custodial interrogation of petitioner is no more required. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without Sachin Mehta 2017.12.20 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-2092-2017 -2expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 23.01.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against her so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) December 20, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.12.20 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH