Amarjit Bishnoi v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.534 CWP-9897-1999 (O&M) Date of decision: May 12, 2022 Amarjit Singh Bishnoi ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Tushar Wadhwa, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. R.D. Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petition herein, inter alia, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to release the subsistence allowance as per Punjab Civil Services Rules during the suspension period of petitioner, who was working as Ziledar,.

2.

Petition was filed in the year 1999 and has been lying admitted ever since. When called out for hearing, learned counsel is unable to assist the Court for lack of instructions. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that despite attempts, his office could not contact the petitioner. 3.

It seems that by sheer effluxion of time and pendency of the writ petition for more than 22 years before this Court, it has been rendered infructuous and/or the petitioner seems to have lost interest in pursuing the same. 4.

Be that as it may, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in case any cause of action still survives.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE May 12, 2022 ashish Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No ASHISH 2022.05.16 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document