Sunita Verma v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9927-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.07.2024 Sunita Verma and another

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- None for the petitioners Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana *** TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the office orders dated 05.05.1998, Annexures P-8 & P-9, whereby the petitioners, who had been working as Punjabi Teachers on adhoc basis, were relieved from service.

2.

Learned State counsel contends that the petitioners were appointed on adhoc basis, and as per instructions dated 06.08.1998, Annexure P-7, they had to be relieved on appointment/posting of regularly selected candidates in the district. The only reason to relieve them was, the posting of regularly selected Punjabi Teachers.

3.

In view thereof, there is no merit in the petitioners' claim. 4.

Dismissed.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 31.07.2024 Payal PAYAL 2024.08.01 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No