Kiran v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH (Through video-conferencing) CRM-M No.15498 of 2021 Date of Decision: 16.09.2021 KIRAN ......Petitioner Vs STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr. Sudhir Kumar Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anant Kataria, D.A.G., Haryana.
**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in her second attempt in case bearing FIR No.125 dated 04.07.2019 registered under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act at Police Station Sanoli, District Panipat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been summoned only under Section 319 Cr.P.C. by the trial Court and against that order CRR No.146 of 2021 is pending for 03.12.2021. Petitioner was found innocent during
course of investigation. Offences under Sections 328, 376-D, 365 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act were deleted and Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act were added. This is the second petition preferred by the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. The earlier petition bearing CRM-M No.13061 of 2021 filed by the petitioner was got dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 31.03.2021 with a liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.
Vide orders dated 14.09.2021 and 08.04.2021 passed in the cases of co-accused Rantej Singh @ Teja i.e. CRM-M No.11113 of 2021 and co-accused Seema i.e. CRM-M No.15556 of 2021 respectively, they were directed to appear and surrender before the trial Court/Duty Magistrate and on their appearance, they were to be admitted on bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. The interim order dated 08.04.2021 passed in the case of co-accused Seema in CRM-M No.15556 of 2021 has been made absolute vide order dated 03.09.2021.
In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it would be just and appropriate to direct to the petitioner to appear and surrender before the trial Court/Duty Magistrate within a period of two weeks from today. On doing so, petitioner shall be admitted to bail subject to her furnishing adequate bail
bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
With the aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of. (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) September 16, 2021 JUDGE Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No