Sumit Singh Alias Daddu And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 Sumit Singh @ Daddu and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present :
Mr. C.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Ms. Komalpreet K.Sohi, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.
N.S.SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral) 1.
The instant petition has been filed under Section 582 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No. 0240 of 26.12.2022 under Sections 307, 451, 323, 427, 148, 149, 506 IPC & Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act 1959 registered at Police Station Tibba, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana, (Annexure P-1) alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 23.01.2023 (Annexure P-3).
-22.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the injuries suffered by the injured/victims in the present case are simple in nature and no injury was declared to be dangerous to life. 3.
Vide order dated 20.03.2026 while issuing notice of motion, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the aforesaid compromise. 4.
Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, and got their statements recorded. Report dated 19.05.2026 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.
5.
I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.
6.
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners.
-37.
Resultantly, FIR No. 0240 of 26.12.2022 under Sections 307, 451, 323, 427, 148, 149, 506 IPC & Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act 1959 registered at Police Station Tibba, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana, (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
02.07.2026 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) amit rana JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking :
Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No