Anjali & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS
Crl. Misc. No. M-21943 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-21943 of 2016 Date of decision : 29.06.2016 Anjali and another ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present:
Both the petitioners in person with counsel Mr. Naveen Kashyap, Advocate.
-- ANITA CHAUDHRY, J. (ORAL) Anjali and Rajat, the petitioners before me, claim themselves to be major. They have pleaded that they have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 10 and seek protection to their life and liberty. They apprehend danger from respondents No. 4 to 10. A photocopy of the marriage certificate has been placed on record. They have placed on record photographs Annexures P-3 evidencing their marriage. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 24.6.2016, Annexure P-4 to respondent no.2.
Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with directions to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioners, Annexure P-4 within a period of one month and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action GURPREET SINGH 2016.06.29 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M-21943 of 2016 for violation of law if any committed by them. (ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE June 29, 2016 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2016.06.29 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh