Neena Goyal v. State Of Punjab And ORS

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22025-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.12.2022 Neena Goyal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and Others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Abhimanyu Kalsy, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, AAG, Punjab ***** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) Status report dated 15.12.2022 by way of affidavit of Ramandeep Singh Bhullar, ACP (Central) Ludhiana is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that an application was filed before learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ludhiana to permit to take photograph of the agreement for the purpose of comparison of signatures of the petitioner and her husbandSushil Kumar. The application has been allowed by learned Civil Judge, vide order dated 13.12.2022.

On being confronted with the afore-stated fact, learned counsel for the petitioner states that his grievance stands redressed and accordingly, the petition may be disposed of as infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.12.2022 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2022.12.15 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment