Naveen v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10991-2020 (O&M) Decided on : 15.12.2020 Naveen . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL (Through Video Conferencing) PRESENT: Mr. Sube S. Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arun Beniwal, DAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Anita Kumari.

Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, for the complainant. **** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No. 69, dated 05.02.2020, under Sections 323, 342, 376, 406, 498-A, 506, 511 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station City Jind.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to order dated 27th May, 2020, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Anita Kumari, states that the petitioner has since joined investigation and recovery of gold articles has been effected from him.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the differences between the complainant-wife and her husband, who too is an accused in the FIR in question have been ironed out and the complainant has returned to her matrimonial home, where she is now living happily with her husband.

JAWALA RAM 2020.12.15 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-10991-2020 (O&M) - 2 - In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 27th May, 2020, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE December 15, 2020 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2020.12.15 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh