Navneet Jindal v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-21990 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-21990 of 2016 Date of Decision: 07.12.2016 Navneet Jindal ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Deepak Basatia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Kunal Garg, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 42 dated 10.6.2016, registered under Sections 323, 325, 406, 498-A, 506, 354-C IPC, registered at Women Police Station Yamuna Nagar.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 13.7.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

MLR report filed by the complainant was seen. It does not refer to any history of assault by the husband. The petitioner has already joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.07 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-21990 of 2016 -2merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 13.7.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 07, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.07 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh