Rohit Puri v. State Of Punjab And ANR




    
       Date of decision: 14th September, 2015  Rohit Puri

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. A.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1 Mr. Sanjeev Roy, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Report dated 11.08.2015 of learned Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.)4 cum4Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Reema and the accused namely Rohit Puri, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial dispute coupled with the fact that compromise will go RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.16 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court





 a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in %&'(!&()*+!,',- 

.(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 #$   #2&3&('4$ 5 and %6.47&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-28 + !,',-   .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 9 #5$   #2&3&('4$  " the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.18 dated 14.02.2013 registered at Police Station Women Cell, Jalandhar City under Sections 406/498A IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

#  !
$     !-:,-30-2" 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.16 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court