← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/12528/2025allowed

Rakesh Kumar @ Halwai Kaler Kanth And Others v. State Of Punjab & Another

2025-05-27Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu7 pages

 

      

 !

" #

  $%& ''$()*+" +"

              ) ,- +.   .

.

  



 !"#   

  !!$  

 !"# %&'

 .

.

/+ 

* "

   

#          #  '&(   ) *%+   &,&-.  /)%01 #+

# "  %2'#

# 

,3,-&,&' %#

#4

#5 

   !!"#$    ## # %26 

 !"# ## # %&'  ##

# -1-

7 "   "      "

    

#  

*  # 8#  "  %2' 

#  + *  

 !

"

     #'&()%

*+ 9 +$%&2-2,:&,&-.421  ;7%:- 2(,:&,&-   #-&- <'& <&: 2<( #2<= 7> 2(3,.  /7>01  + # %+  !

      #  !

 +      #9 

#+ +  #

&-2&&,&< .4&1        %&' & !+   

   * 

# #

#   * 

  #"  #  #



 * - Contends that matter has been amicably settled between the parties, i.e. petitioners as well as respondent Nos.2 to 5; hence GD in question as well as consequential proceedings deserve to be quashed. < ?   #      %&    '     #+#    ' Still further, learned State Counsel, on instructions from the police officer present, is not averse in case the above GD along with consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside on the basis of the -2-

compromise entered into between the parties i.e. petitioners well as respondent Nos.2 to 5.

6.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paperbook. : @>  +#  # ,3,-&,&'  + 







 

  

  

    

!

 " 



#  

 $$% & '



  

 ()#  *

!

 # '  #  #  $+ 



 &

$ ,  

   - 



  .

   &/

+

  

    01  

     

  



 , 2

&   

 +



 

 

 



+ 





340

,    5 4 





 

 4

!

)

 6 6 





 

 

  7

8

 4 !

)



 





) '



 

  9 





 :/  ;





 





 < -3-

 ;



 

<

 ;





'



,



)

 

   < + ;







, 

 < + ;

 

++

)    





  < + ;

  

)

+   +

< =  6*6



 (6 !   

 #   

 

 





#

' < (( ,

 

 > 

  





?

( In terms of aforesaid order, statements of both the parties were recorded and a report dated 19.04.2025 has been received from   A # + ; > !

 . For reference, the operative part of report reads as under:-   -





 



 





 

 -







1 

 



 -





'





+ -





 4+

 





 -4-

+ -





 4+

+  



& 



   -





 4+

+   + ?

A perusal of the aforesaid extract clearly reveals that matter has been compromised by both sides with their free consent, voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Even before this Court also, there is no objection by either side against each other.  =

0

> ' (.'(012+.  $%3(4 5/ " "."/ 

2( -  

   

   :



.





9



  '





  

+



   

#

6  4  

      ,  

9 



  



  

@ :

   ' 

 +

  

  4   





, 9   

+ 

     

   

  , 

 .+

 9   

.

  +  

,

 .  

    

,



  ,   ,  +  

A ,



+    #  

+

 

  , #

,



  -5-





 

& +

 $

   ,      

, B  +



 

++    C 

 +  ,

 ,  +

  



 

, 





 



 

 



 

,

  ,

,   

 ,

 

+

+



  4  ,  .

,

 

   

  , +







   

 

' 

9 

'     ,

  

 

 4 

  .

  



  



,

  '    





    

    





  ' 

 

 





1  

+ .

 

 '



 ?

2, In view of above discussion, this Court is fully convinced that the offence is entirely personal in nature and does not affect public peace or tranquility. Thus, quashing of the GD in question along with consequential proceedings, on the basis of compromise would bring peace and harmony to secure the ends of justice.

-6-

22 >9 * 

 6 $+ #9 

#+  +   9 1 

  +

#.1 *   *+" +"

 .

.



 

  

          -7-