Jai Singh v. State Of Haryana Through Engineer In Chief

108-2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11498-2026 Date of Decision: 24.04.2026 Jai Singh ....Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Ms. Anjali Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to release payment with respect to work carried out by him for the respondent. 2.

The aforesaid Civil Writ Petition was e-filed on 03.02.2026 by Sh. Rohit Mittal, Advocate. The Registry had approved the file. Counsel for the petitioner had not submitted hard copy of the same, which is mandatory. 3.

It appears that petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. Moreover, CWP No.6424-2026 involving same issue has already been decided.

4.

Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 24.04.2026 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes No Whether reportable:

Yes No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.04.24 04:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document