Wazir v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CRM-M-21166-2015 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-21166-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 27, 2016 Wazir

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Amit Khatkar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Saini, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1.

Mr. J.S. Lalli, Advocate, for Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral):

CRM-6589-2016:

Prayer in this criminal miscellaneous application is for placing on record reply in the shape of short affidavit (Annexure R-2/1) on behalf of the applicant/respondent No. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.27 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-21166-2015 (O&M) going through the contents of the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and the reply/short affidavit (Annexure R-2/1) is taken on record. CRM-M-21166-2015:

Learned counsel for the parties are in unison that the present petition be disposed of with a direction to learned Appellate Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, to consider the factum of the compromise while deciding the appeal on merits. After hearing learned counsel for the parties the present petition is disposed of with a direction to learned First Appellate Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, to consider the factum of the compromise, in accordance with law, while deciding the appeal on merits.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE February 27, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.27 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document