High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/21227/2017disposed of

Anand v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2017-09-04Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

CRM-M-21227 of 2017 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-21227 of 2017 Date of Decision: 04.9.2017 Anand .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA

Present:

Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Avinash Jain, AAG, Haryana.

**** HARI PAL VERMA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to complete the investigation in FIR No. 364 dated 8.8.2016, registered under Section 306/34 IPC at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak (Annexure P-2). Mr. Namit Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 4 to 7 and filed memo of appearance, which is taken on record.

Reply by way of affidavit of Mr. Vijay Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rohtak on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 has been filed in the Court which is taken on record. Copy supplied. Learned State counsel on the strength of the reply and on instructions from ASI Narinder Singh states that the police has investigated the matter and during investigation, no incriminating evidence has come on record against Krishan Lal, Sudesh, Manish and Aarti regarding any Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.09.06 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-21227 of 2017 -2pressure on deceased Satpal to commit suicide. Accordingly, the Investigating Officer of the case has prepared a cancellation report and the same is now pending consideration before the Superintendent of Police, Rohtak as the same was submitted to him on 27.4.2017. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and noticing the prayer made by the petitioner in the present petition as well as the stand of the respondent-State, this Court finds that once the matter has already been investigated by the police and a cancellation report has been submitted for approval before the Superintendent of Police concerned, the prayer of the petitioner no more survives.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

However, the Superintendent of Police, Rohtak is directed to take a decision on the cancellation report so prepared by the investigating officer preferably within a period of three months from today. (HARI PAL VERMA) JUDGE September 04, 2017 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.09.06 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh