← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/6562/2026disposed of

Chand Kumar Sangwan v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited And Others

2026-03-06Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-6562-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.03.2026 Chand Kumar Sangwan ....Petitioner

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present:

Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents Nos.1 to 6 to count the past regular service rendered by petitioner in the office of Director Industrial Training of Vocational Education, Muana, Jind (Haryana) i.e. respondent No.6 w.e.f. 15.04.1994 to 09.01.2006, when the petitioner joined UHBVN through proper channel as qualifying service for the purpose of ACP Scales, Pay Protection, carry forward of leave benefits, increments and for other service benefits like calculation of pension, pensionary/retiral benefits as per Rule 15 of Haryana Civil Service (Pension) Rules 2016. Further prayer has been made to direct

respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation dated 03.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) forthwith. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she would be satisfied if the representation dated 03.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner is decided by respondent No.3 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and files her Memo of Appearance, which is taken on record. The Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place.

5.

Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, submits that she has no objection, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.3 for time-bound consideration and decision of the representation dated 03.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner by passing a speaking order.

6.

Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation dated 03.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found

entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.3.

7.

Disposed of, accordingly.

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 06.03.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No