Satya Devi And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-21253-2017 Date of decision: 21.01.2020 Satya Devi and another ..... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioners.

Mr. NK Banka, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 2. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioners have gone un-represented.

On instructions from SI Kewal Singh, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous, on account of acquittal of the petitioners vide judgment dated 11.09.2018, rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patiala. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution and as having been rendered infructuous, as well. January 21, 2020 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2020.01.24 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document