Sudesh And ANR. v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-22249 of 2016 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22249 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision: August 11, 2016 Sudesh and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.B. CHAUDHARI

Present:

Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG Haryana.

Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the applicant-complainant.

**** A.B. CHAUDHARI, J (Oral) CRM No.24000 of 2016 Heard.

Application is allowed and Annexures R-1 to R-3 are taken on record.

CRM-M-22249 of 2016 Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the order dated 11.07.2016 made by this Court granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from Assistant Sub Inspector Narender Singh, states that pursuant to the order dated 11.07.2016, petitioners have joined investigation and custody is not required.

Mahavir Singh 2016.08.12 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-22249 of 2016 (O&M) In that view of the matter, the interim order dated 11.07.2016 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners, is made absolute.

Petition stands disposed of, accordingly.

(A.B. CHAUDHARI) JUDGE August 11, 2016 mahavir Whether speaking/ reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Mahavir Singh 2016.08.12 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh