Sumit Kumar v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No.22343 of 2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.22343 of 2018 Date of Decision.04.02.2020 Sumit Kumar

...Petitioner

Vs State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Dishant Tuteja, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Daniel Damodar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

-.- JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.01 dated 03.01.2018 registered under Sections 323, 34, 376, 406, 498-A, 506, 511 IPC at Police Station Madlauda, Panipat.

2.

By an order dated 24.05.2018 while issuing notice of motion, this Court had granted interim bail to the petitioner and directed him to join investigation.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the after the petitioner had joined investigation, the matter has been investigated and challan has been presented and therefore, his custodial interrogation would not be required.

PANKAJ KUMAR 2020.02.05 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.22343 of 2018 -24.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State on instructions from ASI Ram Niwas submits that petitioner has joined investigation.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6.

In view of the fact that the petitioner has joined investigation and challan has already been presented, the instant petition is allowed and the order dated 24.05.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE February 04, 2020 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2020.02.05 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document