← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/7690/2001dismissed

Radhey Shyam v. The Bhiwani Central Coop.Bank Ltd.

2025-07-14Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal6 pages

   

 



    

 !

"#

!$%&%"'(

)**  +  

     



   

  (  , - * .  

.-

   ! "# $ " % 

    &"# $ " %   

.-/ *

01 '



 !  

#

$(() ((*% 



%+  

!

! %  (( ,- '..*/ % 

$ ( 

0   #! 1'.2, 3  $  '.24 #$% /55    $1'..6 

 %!  " " $  3 $!

#7+8 *)  '( ,4 '..6$

6,.+   $



  !

!  

3$%/%/ %%    %%

 5 *",-",,,9:%   3$  / 

 (( ,- '..* 3 $;

  $

 $ !

 0!     '4 ,'

'..*  /   

  3 %   /% !

"



$

"3  $  / 

 ') ,6 '..2  ! "$% 

/

 

$;

 $

$ !" "     % 

$ $%     $ $  $/



$

 $ %    /

  $ %

 %$  $ !  

 #$;

$

$ !   

$ <

! %  $ !   $ ! 

- +  !   $ ) $ %  %$   <$ ! 0 

  #

$(()9((*% 



%+   $  $ !

  

            ;   %  $9 

 %   $

 

 !%%$ + % 



%  3 !  <$

0 

#

$(() % 



 % +  $     $ % / 

  + $"

 %  ;  %% $   $   

    $   

$  $  

$$$ // /%"  $  % # :=!$%3>/    





   

   

! 

 $ %  %$  #

$ (() % 



 % +    $   $ !     

  %$  %  ! 

  ? % 

$ /;  /  ; "

 & $   #

    $

       ;     !

%

$$

3>/  $ 

0 $  $ ! :0!$0!    

 !  "

 < $ % 0!   @

           

!  "     #   $  %      &  "' ( ) * + , @

 -     

.   #   

    

         #    (    (        /   0  "                  (  0

 "    #    

0 #        

!  "#

(   .   (  0     , 12  /   3 12  /         3 12  (    4   3

12  (    (                  (       3 1 2  ( 

   (         (     3 12    #    (     #   

             (  (  (    3 12                    (  3 12            (       3 12   ( 

&   

! "#  

, 12     (  3 12       /#        3 12  /  (  3 1(2     (  3 1(2   #       (     

1(2         (  (      3 1(2     +  6 7 7 7 7

 0       #      #    -     



   (     (        (        /    '    (       /           /#   -                   /     +  (   ( #     4  ( #      #   0          (    (                           +         0       #   ) * +12 "      /     +      0 #     -  

    

 .      '       #         #   0            #         6 *   

!   3 !  $ < %$ 

 /%  !$/

  

      %    3 !  $ :;

%;  % " " % %      

  !%%$"    

 :$ ;  %

 8.

The sole ground to challenge findings of Departmental Authorities is acquittal in criminal case. This Court is of the considered opinion that if criminal proceedings are initiated besides departmental proceedings, the outcome of departmental proceedings, in view of the fact that both proceedings are independent and different yardstick is applied, cannot be ignored or brushed aside on account of dropping of criminal proceedings. In case of departmental proceedings, the department is not bound to prove its case beyond the reasonable doubt because findings depend upon preponderance of probability.

.



%        % 



!  

 %$ %   

  

 %$$ //

 %!  % :$$

 ',  &  ''



 ! $

" %"  % '6 ,* (,(- =#A ?3#8#8#  

  =B&AC D 9

!  E D  / E