Suresh Jindal v. State Of Haryana And Others
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRWP-2597-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.03.2026 Suresh Jindal ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral) 1.
Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus seeking direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent No.4.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen of 80 years old and he was unnecessarily harassed by respondent No.4, who is a property dealer. In this regard, a representation dated 14.01.2026 (Annexure P-6) was submitted, but no action has been taken so far.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana, accepted notice on behalf of respondent-State and submitted that representation shall be be looked into in accordance with law.
GEETA RANI 2026.03.13 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
CRWP-2597-2026 (O&M) ( 2 ) 5.
Heard.
6.
Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, Ambala, to consider the representation dated 14.01.2026 (Annexure P-6) and after assessing the threat perception of the petitioner, to take steps in accordance with law expeditiously. However, regarding his agreement to sell, the petitioner can exhaust his legal remedy as per law. ( SUBHAS MEHLA ) 10.03.2026 JUDGE Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2026.03.13 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh