Karamdin And Another v. State Of Punjab

A perusal of record shows in the present case, following are the relevant factors which are required to be taken into consideration for a decision:- the petitioners have already joined the investigation; ii.

that the petitioners cannot be forced to assist the prosecuting agency for the recovery of incriminating material, which may harm his interests or may amount to defeating his right of defence, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of 'Vinay Kumar Gupta v. State of Madhya Pradesh' [Criminal Appeal No.939 of 2026, decided on 16.02.2026];

iii. that as per law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of 'Sanjay Sharma v. State of Haryana' [Criminal Appeal No.767 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026], collection of evidence is the responsibility of the

Investigating Officer, and that an accused cannot be compelled to self-incriminate himself;

and the fact that the petitioners have already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 21.04.2026, whereby the petitioners were accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute.