← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/11325/2026allowed

Wasim v. State Of Haryana

2026-04-08Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-11325 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.04.2026 Wasim ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present:

Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1.

This petition for anticipatory bail, is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of 'the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023'. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.147 dated 27.06.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 5 and 13(2) of 'the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015' and Section(s) 11 of 'the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960' Police Station Pinangwan, District Nuh, Haryana. 2.

Vide order dated 18.03.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation.

3.

Heard.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.08 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-11325 of 2026 4.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 18.03.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 18.03.2026 be made absolute. 5.

The learned State Counsel has filed status report. The same be taken on record. The learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required.

6.

The record has been perused carefully.

7.

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already join the investigation, the order dated 18.03.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. The present petition stands allowed, accordingly. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge April 08, 2026 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.08 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document