Gurpreet Singh v. State Of Punjab
-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11552-2026 Decided on: 19.03.2026
......Petitioner Versus
......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present:
Mr. Sant Pal Sidhu
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) ! " " # $%& '(&)&*" #
" +,(-*
.)-&)&/ " )* .) . 0*1' ( 0'(1&)&* "&/2&3 4" 0 " ). - 0&1 .$0&1 *&$0$10/1 '( &)&* 2 &30*1 4"
# 1" # (
" 5 # & ! " +, " " " 4
4#5
%)-&)&/ -$/4 " # 4# 44 " " " " "" " 6 #
-2-
5 # # % ) # ##8 ##"" 9
" " * 7 "# " #"# 4#
"
" """ #4 " 4#9
4 :"
" " " " 4 " ;9
4 " # ;
" 4# (
< #
< '
#
7 < #<" # <+ " " #
= 6 <7
: " #"
# ; " " " "" # "
," # # >#
#"""9 9 #
&3) &)&- " 4 # #
& )&&)&- # #
"4"" " "
4 ##
, 8 : ;
"
# > ' ">
).)&&)&- "" >;;//3/ ;&)&/: 4 ;
" 4#(
<(
7
-3-
"# # "" $ ( 4 / , "
"
" #" ;
"" "" # #" 4 " "#""#
"" "; as per mobile tower location of petitioner's phone, he was at the spot; the name of the petitioner is also specifically mentioned in the FIR; vide order passed by ld. Additional Sessions Judge, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join the investigation but he has not cooperated and did not even join the investigation and this fact has specifically been mentioned by the learned Additional Sessions Judge while dismissing the anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the present petition seeking anticipatory bail. - 6 3 5
"2 4" ""
"
# " # "# "
## " " " " # ;
" # "" ##" "
"# #""#: " " 4 +, "#
"#"" "
"" #" 4
-4- 4 ##
: ":" " 4 # > #
#""" 9 # "
""
## 4 by the said Court in the impugned order while dismissing the anticipatory bail to the petitioner; as such, taking into totality of the facts & circumstances of the present case and the conduct of the petitioner that he did not join the investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. % 5
# "" " " # "
# " ""
9.
Nothing observed herein shall be construed as ?"" ">#"4 # (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 19.03.2026 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable:
YES/NO