Narender Kumar v. Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH




CWP No.6487 of 2024 Date of Decision:20.03.2024 Narender Kumar ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate and Mr. Mohit Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Paul S.Saini, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication dated 05.01.2024 (Annexure P-4) whereby candidature of the petitioner for Retail Outlet Dealership has been rejected.

2.

Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, at the outset, submits that petitioner, as per policy, has filed representation dated 14.01.2024 before the authorities against the rejection of his candidature. Respondent No. 3, within two weeks from today, would decide his representation, in accordance with the policy.

PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.03.20 05:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.6487 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:039824 3.

Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate, agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.

4.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 20.03.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.03.20 05:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document