Tanveer @ Tannu v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-21685 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21685 of 2017 Date of Decision: 19.06.2017 Tanveer @ Tannu ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 240 dated 03.04.2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 20 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station Saran Faridabad, District Faridabad. Heard.
Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Shamsher submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no more required for further investigation of the case. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 12.06.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make Jitender Kumar 2017.06.20 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21685 of 2017 -2any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.
(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.
June 19, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.06.20 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH