Heena Rani v. State Of Punjab And Others

 

         

       !"##

   $

%     & 

'(! ')*+,-#./%0
-.(1'()+()%(, 
 

 

  

    

      


.(1'()+()%(,2.#3'(,4
















The petitioner, through the instant petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. is seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No. 2 in FIR No. 23 dated 12.2.2022 under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC, registered at Police Station City Fazilka, District Fazilka.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after grant of bail, respondent No. 2 started threatening the petitioner and her brother of dire consequences. Some dowry articles are still to be recovered. The Additional Sessions Judge, Fazilka without appreciating the facts on record has granted bail to respondent No. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Manjeet Singh, submits that respondent has already joined investigation on PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.01.09 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment



   3.3.2022 and interim bail was made absolute vide order dated 11.3.2022 passed by ASJ, Fazilka. He further, on instructions, submits that there is no threat perception to the petitioner and intention of the petitioner is just to get respondent No. 2 arrested. The petitioner has already joined investigation and interim bail was made absolute by ASJ, Fazilka vide order dated 11.3.2022. There is nothing on record disclosing threat perception to the petitioner, thus, present petition is devoid of merit and deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

3.(1'()+()%(,4 ./ 1- "##

 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

 

  !"

PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.01.09 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment