Rajni v. Harsh Latawa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.102 TA-342-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.12.2024 ....Applicant
Versus
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Ankit Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.
Respondent proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 18.12.2024.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) CM-5104-CII-2023 Keeping in view the averments made in the application, same is allowed.
Main case
!
"#"$% &'
& % ()' %* ) )
+ , - %
) % .
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 14.08.2021, but no child Sonu 2024.12.20 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC
was born from the said wedlock. However, on account of the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant has already filed the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which is pending in the Courts at Bathinda and the respondent is making appearance in the same. The case is fixed for recording of evidence. It is submitted that when the applicant is not having any source of earning, it is difficult for her to commute a distance of about 150-160 kilometres, to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. / view the aforesaid fact situation as well as considering the position of law about weightage to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute and also considering the respondent not having made appearance to contest the application, the transfer application is allowed and
!
"#"$%
&'
& %
) ()' % * % )
+ , 0 &
&' ()' %* % 1%, . 1%, % ()' %, 23 % & ()' %, % )
) '
(ARCHANA PURI) 20.12.2024 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
Yes/No Sonu 2024.12.20 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC