Sukhdeep Singh @ Rinku & Another v. State Of Punjab And Another



















   

     
  



!"

# $%&%!'( )* +* ,-  , .

-   

**** %%!' /& 0 /&1&

,

  

 

*** &2!'# '& (  34 ,* ,
 - , 













 






 !

- ,

* *

/ 5







"


#!$

%& 


!'!(

)

*+,
 !$

!- '

!'!. 

$#
(-
/!0

(
/#0

%


"
  
1




""

)"
 
2





22

!'

'!

!'!#

/3
4 !0

!

5
"
"




"



 " (


6
7"



2


 '- '( !'!#







"
68+"")
 


2
7



22

!

















.








( '( !'!#

 
2


1"
9"

 

"
 


"

2





 




7




2


"

7
2

&








*+,

)

)


22

7
2


7
&

" 


#


*""
%


6






    

   

!

"#
"

5
6

7 

.$!
6 

""7

2

42 " 

)


7

5
6



7

 2
7
)



 




"7

7
 



 
7

)




22" 
" - 5:

"

2
6




$





       "

%

!

#% 

 



 








 



6
 7



&

6

)
2"


7

24 2


 
"



#;



2 
 4
"57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code.

(

















Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.

xxx xxx xxx. "

;

+
7


4
2




 "
6

2 "
"2
7

/0


24 "

6


)

*+,
7""


)

""
4 
7












&

 
"

"
" 

"

7"



 











2"
 






) $ ,""&




""7

*+,
 !$
 !- '

!'!.


$#
(-
/!0

(
/#0

%


"
4 
 
1




""

)"
4 

)
)

/0





22
 !'

'!

!'!#

/3
4!0




&2

, !''''84



 


<"
*
+ =,
6
7



 2

9.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

- , )* +*

 

'# 2 <
8

>8  <
, "

>8