High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/22763/2018dismissed

Taj Mohammad @Taji v. State Of Punjab

2018-07-31Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-22763 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 31, 2018 Taj Mohammad alias Taji

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Kunal Vinayak, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Karanbir Singh, AAG, Punjab for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.20 dated 24.02.2017 under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station GRP, District Amritsar.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. As per the allegations, 15 injections each of Buprenorphene and Avil were recovered from the present petitioner. The recovery of 15 injections of Buprenorphene falls under commercial quantity. Section 37 of VINEET GULATI 2018.08.07 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh the NDPS Act bars the grant of bail to the accused in case commercial

CRM No.M-22763 of 2018 -2quantity.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not find it a fit case, where petitioner is entitled to benefit of regular bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

July 31, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.08.07 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh