Sahid v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-2182 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2182 of 2017 Date of Decision: 07.03.2017 Sahid ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Arjun Atri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 2 dated 02.01.2017 registered for offence punishable under Section 5/13 (2) of the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015, at Police Station Pinangwa, District Mewat. Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 24.01.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make Jitender Kumar 2017.03.08 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-2182 of 2017 -2any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

March 07, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.03.08 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH