Jagdish Singh v. S.P. Kaithal & ANR

-1CRM-M-22842 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22842 of 2018 Date of Decision: 25.03.2019 Jagdish Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

Superintendent of Police, Kaithal, and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Surender Pal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, Advocate, for the accused.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel has filed two vakalatnamas on behalf of the accused on his own, though they have not been impleaded as party. The same are taken on record.

Through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 and 2 to conduct proper investigation and arrest the accused in case FIR No.4 dated 01.01.2018 registered under Sections 120-B, 201, 302 IPC at Police Station City Kaithal, District Kaithal.

Learned State counsel contends that instant petition has rendered infructuous in view of the fact that matter is under investigation with the Crime Branch, who is proceeding with the investigation in a legal RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.27 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-22842 of 2018 manner.

In view of above, petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) March 25, 2019 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.27 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document