Bhupender Alias Pappi v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-21929-2015 BHUPENDER @ PAPPI VS STATE OF HARYANA Present :

Mr.,G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Chetan Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

*** AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) :- Learned Assistant Advocate General has stated that in the petition of the co-accused a time cap has been fixed within which the prosecution evidence has to be concluded.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in these circumstances he would not press this petition. Allowed as prayed for.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(AJAY TEWARI) 27.08.2015 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I POOJA SHARMA 2015.08.31 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh