Bhim Singh v. State Of Hy.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-8299-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 BHIM SINGH

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to count special pay of Rs.200/- per month for the purpose of pension. 2.

As per reply, the petitioner cannot claim any benefit with respect to his service in Haryana State Electricity Board (for short 'HSEB') because HSEB is a Corporation whereas CID and State Vigilance are part of Police Department.

3.

The officers posted in CID and Vigilance are given special pay and not the police officers sent on deputation to HSEB. 4.

There is no representation of the petitioner. It appears that with the efflux of time, petitioner has lost interest to pursue the matter. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.12.08 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-8299-2001 (O&M) -25.

Dismissed with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. 6.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE December 08, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.12.08 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document