Neha Sharma v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No. 7051 of 2019 Date of decision : 30.9.2022 Neha Sharma ......Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

Present:

None for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, DAG, Haryana Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate, for respondent no.2/HPSC Ms. Gehna Vaishnavi, Advocate, for respondents no.3 and 4 --- AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH , J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the Haryana Public Service Commission/ respondent no. 2 submits that the present writ petition would not survive in the light of the fact that the petitioner, who did qualify for the interview did not participate in the same resulting in her not obtaining the required 50% marks overall.

Since the counsel for the petitioner has not come present, we dismiss the writ petition in default, at this stage. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 30.9.2022 Aw Whether Speaking/Reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.09.30 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document