Malkit Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS
Date of decision: 17th September, 2015 Malkit Singh and another
Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
Respondents 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. TVS Lehal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
Mr. Abhishek Singla, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
!"
# Report dated 04.08.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurdaspur has been received whereby after recording statements of Shamsher Singh and Baljit Singh from the complainant side and that of the accused persons namely Malkit Singh, Harnit Kaur and Lakhwinder Kaur, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.18 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Heard.
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties are co8villagers and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in $%&' %'() * +&+, -'.&/ &'0 &'+),1 "# "1%2%'&3# 4 and $5-36%'0,1 %'()&'0+),17* +&+, -'.&/ &'0&'+),1 8"4# "1%2%'&3# !the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.23 dated 19.02.2012 registered at Police Station Ghuman Kalan, District Gurdaspur under Sections 324/326/427/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.
The petition stands allowed in those terms.
"
# ,9+,2/,18! RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.18 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court