Praveen v. State Of Haryana And ANR




    
      Date of decision: 14th September, 2015  Praveen

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 
!"

# Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Praveen in case FIR No.52 dated 15.04.2015 registered at Police Station GRP Rewari under Sections 354/354D/509 IPC.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that in compliance of the orders of this Court dated 10.07.2015 the petitioner has since joined the investigation, which is not controverted by learned RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.15 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Ms.Urmila, Police Station GRP Rewari who further submits that the petitioner is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 10.07.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. "

 
#   $%&$'($) *! 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.15 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court