Gaurav Sharma v. State Of U.T. Chandigarh And Another

CRM-M No. 22106 of 2017 and CRM-M No. 21950 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 22106 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- September 17, 2018 Gaurav Sharma

...Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh and another

...Respondents

CRM-M No. 21950 of 2017 Satish Kumar and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Jasminder Singh Thind, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh in CRM-M No. 21950 of 2017.

Ms. Pooja Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh in CRM-M No. 22106 of 2017. Mr. Manish Dewan, Advocate for the complainant-respondent no. 2.

*** It is stated that petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act has since been filed in the Court of District Judge, Chandigarh and a sum of Rs.5 lacs has been paid by the petitioner to the complainant and now the said petition is fixed for 11.3.2019 for recording statements of PARVINDER SINGH 2018.09.19 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 22106 of 2017 and CRM-M No. 21950 of 2017 the petitioners on second motion.

Learned counsel for the complainant-respondent no. 2 states that he does not oppose the petition for grant of pre arrest bail to petitioner Garuav Sharma in petition bearing CRM-M No. 22106 of 2017 and petitioners Satish Kumar, Veena Sharma and Gaurav Sharma in petition bearing CRM-M No. 21950 of 2017.

Learned counsel for U.T. Chandigarh states that since the matter has been compromised between the parties, the petitioners are not required by the local police for further investigation. Therefore, their custodial interrogation is not required.

Under such circumstances, the interim bail granted to petitioner Garuav Sharma on 15.6.2017 in petition bearing CRM-M No. 22106 of 2017 and to petitioners Satish Kumar, Veena Sharma and Gaurav Sharma on 14.6.2017 in petition bearing CRM-M No. 21950 of 2017 is made absolute, subject to their fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petitions stand allowed accordingly.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE September 17, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2018.09.19 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh