Amanpreet Kaur & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS

-1CRM-M-22086 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22086 of 2015 Date of decision: 10.07.2015 Amanpreet Kaur and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Puneet Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for protection of life and liberty of petitioners from respondents No.4 to 8.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that right now parents of petitioner No.1 are residing in United States of America, however, in the petition inadvertently they have been mentioned to be residing in India. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners were apprehending that parents of petitioner No.1 will arrive in India. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the above, submits that since respondents No.4 to 6 are residing in USA, there is no apprehension of danger to the life and liberty of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this RAVINDER SINGH 2015.07.10 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CRM-M-22086 of 2015 petition with liberty to file fresh one after narrating true facts as and when apprehension arises.

Petitioner No.1 has also apologised for making wrong statement in this Court that her parents are in India. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Paramjeet Singh) Judge July 10, 2015 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.07.10 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document