← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/7240/2022disposed of

Harjinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2022-04-06Ms. Justice Jaishree Thakur2 pages

CWP No.7240 of 2022 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7240 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision.06.04.2022 Harjinder Singh

...Petitioner

Vs State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Baljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Sharda, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

-.- JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL) 1.

This is a petition that has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to count service of the petitioner as Special Police Officer on daily wages rendered by him before regularization as qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits, in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.2371 of 2010 titled as Harbans Lal Vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 31.08.2010. In this regard, a representation dated 28.10.2021 (Annexure P-8) has been given by the petitioner to respondent No.2 but till date no decision has been taken thereon.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Mr. Pawan Sharda, Sr. DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that the respondents will look into the matter and will take a decision on the legal notice of the petitioners. Let sufficient number of copies of the complete paper book be PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.04.07 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP No.7240 of 2022 (O&M) -2supplied to respondent-State during the course of day. 4.

Without commenting on merits of the case, I dispose of the instant petition by directing the respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 28.10.2021 (Annexure P-8) of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and convey the decision to the petitioner, failing which the officer responsible for the lapse would be liable to deposit costs of Rs.20,000/- from his personal pocket with the Punjab and Haryana High Court Advocates Welfare Fund.

(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE April 06, 2022 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.04.07 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document