Roop Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8415-2001 Date of Decision : 08.05.2024 ROOP SINGH ... PETITIONER

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab.

*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to promote him to the post of DSP w.e.f. 01.12.2000 and grant consequential benefits. 2.

Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab, pointing out reply submits that case of the petitioner was under consideration, however, he retired on 30.06.2001. He was appointed as Inspector on 13.09.1988. Darshan Singh-respondent No.5 was not promoted and he retired on 31.05.2002, thus, the present petition has rendered infructuous.

3.

Disposed of as infructuous.

4.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, thus, he is at liberty to move an appropriate application, if cause survives. 08.05.2024 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.05.08 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh