Kamla Bai v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-23106 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 13, 2016 Smt.Kamla Bai
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr.Sunil Saharan, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.508 dated 10.08.2015 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station City Fatehabad, District Fatehabad.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.
From the record, I find that the first bail application filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on merits by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2015. As per prosecution version, the present petitioner Kamla Bai is stated to be beneficiary as the sale deed has been executed in her favour. It is also in the FIR that all the accused were well known that the sale deed has been executed by impersonating the real owners. No changed circumstance has been shown by learned counsel for the petitioner.
VINEET GULATI 2016.07.16 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRM No.M-23106 of 2016 -2Keeping in view the above facts, no ground is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.
July 13, 2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2016.07.16 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh